Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of pH value and aluminium sulphate quantity in the chemical treatment of molasses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to find the optimal working conditions for the chemical treatment of molasses that guarantee coagulation and precipitation of undesired macromolecules. Twenty experiments were performed, within the limits: 3.5≤pH≤8.5 and 0.1 mol Al/l≤c≤0.5 mol Al/l, on samples of molasses treated with Al2(SO4)3 as a precipitant. The efficiency of the treatment was controlled through measuring both the zeta potential and solution absorbance at 560 nm. By analysing the experimental results, it was concluded that the optimum lies within reduced limits of: 4≤pH≤7 and 0.2 mol Al/l≤c≤0.4 mol Al/l, which covers nine experimental points. Based on these measurements, a mathematical model of absorbance changes was defined, in terms of pH and Al2(SO4)3 quantity. The model was taken as the objective function, and the optimal calculated values were obtained: pH=5.3 and c=0.34 mol Al/l. They guarantee a minimal absorbance value of: 0.124 at 560 nm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Absorbance at 560 nm

b :

Parameters in the regression

c=x2:

Concentration of aluminium sulphate in a solution

δ :

Deviation between calculated and measured values

n :

Number of measurements

t :

Measure of parameter significance

x 1 :

pH value of a solution

ZP :

Zeta potential

References

  1. Junghans E (1980) Die Zuckerherstellung. VEB Fachbuchverlag, Leipzig

  2. Duan J, Gregory J (2003) Adv Colloid Interface Sci 100–102:475–502

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wawro S (1994) Gaz Cukrow 102:22–224

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stephenson RJ, Duff SJB (1996) Water Res 30:781–792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cathalifaud G, Ayele J, Mazet M (1997) Water Res 31:689–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pinotti A, Zaritzky N (2001) Waste Manage 21:535–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Duan J, Wang J, Graham N, Wilson F (2002) Desalination 150:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aguilar MI, Sáez J, Lloréns M, Soler A, Ortuño JF (2002) Water Res 36:2910–2919

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tatsi AA, Zouboulis A , Matis KA, Samaras P (2003) Chemosphere 53:737–744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Őzacar M, Şengil ÌA (2003) J Hazard Mater B100:131–146

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erricson PO, Tjebes J (1978) 17th Session ICUMSA, pp. 131–162. Montreal

  12. Mauch W (1990) 20th Session ICUMSA, Colorado Springs, pp. 79–91

  13. Lević LJ, Gyura J (1999) Nahrung 43:S288–S289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reinfeld E, Schreider F (1978) Analytische Betriebskotrolle der Zuckerindustrie. Verlag Dr. Albert Bartens, Berlin

Download references

Aknowledgement

The Ministry of Science, Technology and Development of Serbia (Project No 1362) financially supported this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirjana Djurić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lević, L., Gyura, J., Djurić, M. et al. Optimization of pH value and aluminium sulphate quantity in the chemical treatment of molasses. Eur Food Res Technol 220, 70–73 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-004-1017-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-004-1017-z

Keywords

Navigation